| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 28 | |
| 1. |  | BASSO, C.; RIBEIRO, A.; CIBILS-STEWART, X.; CHIARAVALLE, W.; PUNSCHKE, K. Biological Control in Uruguay; [capítulo 30]. In: van Lenteren JC, Vanda HP, Bueno VHP, Luna MG, Yelitza C, Colmenarez YC. (Eds.). Biological control in Latin America and the Caribbean: it?s rich history and bright future. Wallingford: CAB International, 2020. p.453-463.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|    |
| 2. | | ABBATE, S.; RIVAS, F.; ALTIER, N.; RIBEIRO, A.; BENTANCUR, O.; CASTIGLIONI, E. Compatibilidad de Beauveria bassiana y Lecanicillium attenuatum con insecticidas usados en soja. In: JORNADA NACIONAL DE FITOPATOLOGÍA, 3; JORNADA NACIONAL DE PROTECCIÓN VEGETAL, 1., 3 SETIEMBRE 2015, MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY. Libro de Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay) : SUFIT, 2015. p. 35| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 4. | | ALZUGARAY, R.; BAO, L.; CASCO, M.; CASTRO, M.; CUITIÑO, M.J.; GONZÁLEZ, S.N.; PLA, M.; REBUFFO, M.; RIBEIRO, A.; ZARZA, R. Estrategias recomendadas para mejorar la implantación de leguminosas forrajeras. In:REUNIÓN TÉCNICA (2013, LA ESTANZUELA, COLONIA, UY): el éxito productivo de una pastura con leguminosas perennes comienza en su implantación.La Estanzuela, Colonia: INIA, 2013. p. 43-44. (Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 711).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 7. | | HOFFMAN, E.; RIBEIRO, A. (Ed.). [Actas]. SIMPOSIO NACIONAL DE AGRICULTURA, 2., 2011, Paysandú, UY. No se llega, si no se sabe a dónde ir: el abordaje necesario para que el proceso de expansión agrícola madure en Uruguay. Montevideo: UdelaR. Facultad de Agronomía. EEMAC, 2011. 164 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 11. | | ALZUGARAY, R.; RIBEIRO, A.; SILVA, H.; STEWART, S.; CASTIGLIONI, E.; BARTABURU, S.; MARTINEZ, J.J. Prospección de agentes de mortalidad natural de áfidos en leguminosas forrajeras en Uruguay. [Survey of natural mortality agents of aphids in forage legumes in Uruguay]. Agrociencia, 2010, v. 14, no. 1, p. 27-35 Article history: Recibido 18/11/08 // Aceptado 21/4/10.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 12. | | CASTIGLIONI, E.; RIBEIRO, A.; ALZUGARAY, R.; SILVA, H.; ÁVILA, I.; LOIÁCONO, M. Prospección de parasitoides de huevos de Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) en el litoral oeste de Uruguay. [Survey of egg parasitoids of Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in the western litoral of Uruguay]. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2010, v. 14, no. 2, p. 22-25 Article history: Recibido 9/9/09 // Aceptado 2/8/10.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 20. | | BASSO, C.; RIBEIRO, A. (Ed.). Enemigos naturales como reguladores de poblaciones de insectos: biodiversidad, conservación y manejo. Montevideo, UY: Facultad de Agronomía, 2002. 182 p. Curso de Posgrado, 2001, Montevideo, UY. Autores: César Basso, Eduardo Botto, Jorge Franco, Gabriela Grille, Bernard Pintureau, Danielle Rousse.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 28 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
18/02/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
|
Autor : |
BLUMETTO, O.; CASTAGNA, A.; CARDOZO, G.; GARCIA, F.; TISCORNIA, G.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; AGUERRE, V.; ALBÍN, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES CASTAGNA DU PRE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GERONIMO AGUSTIN CARDOZO CABANELAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FELIPE LUIS GARCIA OLASO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBÍN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Ecosystem integrity index, an innovative environmental evaluation tool for agricultural production systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ecological indicators, 2019, v. 101, p. 725-733. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.077 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 4 July 2018; Received in revised form 9 January 2019; Accepted 29 January 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Environmental assessment of agricultural production systems is an increasing concern within the international community. When evaluation involves biodiversity indicators, as richness or diversity in certain taxa or their roles in ecosystems, the participation of specialists is required to identify, classify and interpret diversity at the level of species, communities and ecosystems. Due to costs and time demand, this can be an important obstacle when a widespread use of these assessments is needed to contribute to policy making and evaluation, field
management decision-making or implementation of a specific technology. We developed a new index that combines different environmental characteristics which can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively with a basic training, can be implemented quickly and each index component is directly associated with key aspects for the assessment of ecosystem capacity to sustain wildlife and ecosystem services. The Ecosystem Integrity Index (EII) evaluates the status of a specific ecosystem under agricultural use, referred to an optimal condition that must be established for the ecoregion. Its application involves a qualitative and quantitative visual evaluation considering four components: vegetation structure, plant species, soil and riparian areas. Each component is valued on a 0?5 scale, where 5 is the best possible condition. EII is a simple and robust tool for evaluating and monitoring integrity of groecosystems and the primary validation demonstrates good correlation with other environmental variables such as wildlife diversity and soil organic carbon. MenosABSTRACT: Environmental assessment of agricultural production systems is an increasing concern within the international community. When evaluation involves biodiversity indicators, as richness or diversity in certain taxa or their roles in ecosystems, the participation of specialists is required to identify, classify and interpret diversity at the level of species, communities and ecosystems. Due to costs and time demand, this can be an important obstacle when a widespread use of these assessments is needed to contribute to policy making and evaluation, field
management decision-making or implementation of a specific technology. We developed a new index that combines different environmental characteristics which can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively with a basic training, can be implemented quickly and each index component is directly associated with key aspects for the assessment of ecosystem capacity to sustain wildlife and ecosystem services. The Ecosystem Integrity Index (EII) evaluates the status of a specific ecosystem under agricultural use, referred to an optimal condition that must be established for the ecoregion. Its application involves a qualitative and quantitative visual evaluation considering four components: vegetation structure, plant species, soil and riparian areas. Each component is valued on a 0?5 scale, where 5 is the best possible condition. EII is a simple and robust tool for evaluating and monitoring integrity of groecosystems and the pr... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GRAZING MANAGEMENT; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; VEGETATION STRUCTURE. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIODIVERSIDAD; ECOSISTEMAS; MANEJO DE PASTOREO; SUSTENTABILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F40 Ecología vegetal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02790naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1059498
005 2020-02-20
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.077$2DOI
100 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
245 $aEcosystem integrity index, an innovative environmental evaluation tool for agricultural production systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received 4 July 2018; Received in revised form 9 January 2019; Accepted 29 January 2019.
520 $aABSTRACT: Environmental assessment of agricultural production systems is an increasing concern within the international community. When evaluation involves biodiversity indicators, as richness or diversity in certain taxa or their roles in ecosystems, the participation of specialists is required to identify, classify and interpret diversity at the level of species, communities and ecosystems. Due to costs and time demand, this can be an important obstacle when a widespread use of these assessments is needed to contribute to policy making and evaluation, field management decision-making or implementation of a specific technology. We developed a new index that combines different environmental characteristics which can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively with a basic training, can be implemented quickly and each index component is directly associated with key aspects for the assessment of ecosystem capacity to sustain wildlife and ecosystem services. The Ecosystem Integrity Index (EII) evaluates the status of a specific ecosystem under agricultural use, referred to an optimal condition that must be established for the ecoregion. Its application involves a qualitative and quantitative visual evaluation considering four components: vegetation structure, plant species, soil and riparian areas. Each component is valued on a 0?5 scale, where 5 is the best possible condition. EII is a simple and robust tool for evaluating and monitoring integrity of groecosystems and the primary validation demonstrates good correlation with other environmental variables such as wildlife diversity and soil organic carbon.
650 $aBIODIVERSIDAD
650 $aECOSISTEMAS
650 $aMANEJO DE PASTOREO
650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD
653 $aBIODIVERSITY
653 $aECOSYSTEM SERVICES
653 $aGRAZING MANAGEMENT
653 $aRIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM
653 $aSUSTAINABILITY
653 $aVEGETATION STRUCTURE
700 1 $aCASTAGNA, A.
700 1 $aCARDOZO, G.
700 1 $aGARCIA, F.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
700 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
700 1 $aALBÍN, A.
773 $tEcological indicators, 2019$gv. 101, p. 725-733.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
